As promised, if I got further responses, I’d post. I’ve received a reply from NRA Director Judge Phillip Journey. Here it is,
I can’t make heads or tails out of Judge Journey’s response. I don’t know what a “cruise” has to do with answering a question of whether NRA bylaws have been violated, (they clearly have) by allowing the formation of a dual office of executive vice president & chief executive officer.
The fact that no officer or director has offered a formal and detailed reply to my concerns, shows potential for the “Streisand effect”, (H/T) https://waronguns.com/on-a-sauer-note-4/ https://www.britannica.com/topic/Streisand-effect
Related, https://2awhiterook.com/jeff-knox-again-responds-to-nras-evp-ceo-problem/ and https://2awhiterook.com/jeff-knox-on-nras-evp-ceo-problem/ and https://2awhiterook.com/can-nra-have-a-evp-ceo/
Equip, train, pray and never disarm.
Update, https://2awhiterook.com/more-indirectly-from-nra-director-judge-journey/
Update, https://2awhiterook.com/nras-2nd-vp-marshall-responds-to-evp-ceo-problem/
Update, https://2awhiterook.com/nras-2nd-v-p-marhsall-responds-again-to-evpceo-problem/
Update, https://2awhiterook.com/nras-2nd-v-p-marshall-says-amending-bylaws-is-a-good-suggestion/
Leave a Reply