AR15’s are not protected by the Second Amendment…
Link, here.
I replied to them,
Link, here.
My response ruffled some feathers in the comments section. But why? Why does 2A, especially professional 2A insist on shooting itself in the foot by shouting “in common use” and then trying to spend ages explaining and defending things which are either confusing at best, or at worst deliberately vague such as,
“The Second Amendment extends, prima facie, to all instruments that constitute bearable arms, even those that were not in existence at the time of the founding… [but] the sorts of weapons protected were those ‘in common use at the time.’”
— Justice Scalia, DC v. Heller, 554 U.S. 570, 582 (2008)
“Arms” in 2A means all the terrible implements of the soldier. And 2A is based off of the fact that self defense is a natural right from God. And obviously anyone who seeks to limit the arms which we can and cannot bear has evil intentions.
KISS- Keep It Simple Stupid. As complexity favors the well connected.
Equip, train, pray and never disarm.
Leave a Reply