I received the following email from NRA director Dennis Fusaro this afternoon, 5-30-26, with the subject, Just posted on NRA in Danger. I present it unedited, and without commentary.
I would not have voted for John Frazer. I did not in 2024, 2025 and I did not in 2026. I did not vote for John Frazer to remain secretary of the NRA.
The reason he was indemnified, as I understand it, is because supposedly his actions did not cost the NRA financial or monetary loss. There was also a sympathy vote for him in 2025.
Nevertheless there is another court of proper jurisdiction that can and should pass judgement on his conduct. That is the board members – a jury if you will – that could’ve analyzed his actions and behaviors during the Reign of Wayne… and found him failing to meet the mark or standards the membership and fundamental principle would’ve required.
He should’ve stood in the door with Wayne, but he didn’t.
Sure the NRA would’ve lost some of his institutional knowledge, but you know such is the cost of standing on principle sometimes. And there are plenty of workarounds to that.
Doug Hamlin is a decent, committed and sincere man.
The NRA is no longer facing financial corruption. The NRA is now facing policy decisions: choices between bad, good and better.
Sometimes doing good things is not enough and that makes doing good things effectively bad.
Because if you don’t do the better thing, you lose the war, in spite of winning a battle.
Doug Hamlin has a huge hill to climb.
I don’t think The NRA leadership with a few exceptions have properly evaluated and understood the generational demographic the NRA is facing. For example, when 57% of Republicans polled between 18 and 49, if memory serves, do not support Israel… and the leadership of the NRA continues to cling to that mentality instead of a truly America First – uphold the US Constitution (see the bylaws under purposes) – Program and when none of them will call out President Trump respectfully for his illegal, unwise and unconstitutional war… a war the US is losing, short term that might work with the Boomer dead-ender generation that represents a plurality of and the current “average” of NRA members.
Maybe the problem is because some are in business with the insider slickster crowd that surrounds President Trump?
But they are not the future. And the future is coming like a shockwave to the United States of America.
Also, change comes at the margin. And at the margin, the NRA is losing the membership recruitment battle. If the NRA does not capture the imagination, activism and energy of the younger men in the younger generational cohorts, it’s gonna disappear or at a minimum become even more irrelevant.
If you want more young women in the NRA m, recruit masculine young men with a purpose (not beta male orbiters), then you’ll get the young women.
And selling NRA feminism with the few ugly women (the many exceptions noted) who are pro-gun definitely won’t work to bring in young men with a purpose (not talking about “incels” who have given up and been demoralized into despair by our gynocentric culture).
The Generational energy the NRA needs will come from that current and future generation of young men who will and are going their own way in the face of a corrupt and dying gynocentric US culture.
Can and will the NRA speak to them?
So far not from what I’ve seen.
And John Frazer’s retention is an indicator of that.
Bring it on disputers!
Like
Equip, train, pray and never disarm.
Leave a Reply