I stumbled across this in the comments section of Ammoland,
That’s a very damning article. If you think it’s shocking, well, it fits a pattern. Glock was one of the companies who caved to the Clinton Admin’s attempts at a government monopoly on violence, https://2awhiterook.com/glock-catalog-update-nssf-leadership-interesting-people/ and of course more recently, not just being MIA in California for the Glock ban hearing, they also have been lobbying for anti 2A legislation in Oklahoma, https://2awhiterook.com/glock-is-anti-2a/
But this article, is very different. I’ve never heard of a gun company asking to see 4473’s. And per AI…
So once again, why did Glock demand to see 4473’s?
And since the article’s a decade old, what’s the Blue Label Program requirements of today? https://us.glock.com/en/products/blue-label-program That’s not an easy page to read. But I didn’t see any mention of Glock needing to view 4473’s.
I believe the news article that the Glock rep demanded to view the 4473’s. First, it’s stated by a commenter on Ammoland who provided a link. Second, the link is a detailed news article. Three, Glock didn’t sue the gun store or news entity into oblivion for defamation.
After I publish this post, I will message Glock on X, with a link to this post, seeking comment. If Glock provides comment, I’ll update the blog post to include any comment in full.
Equip, train, pray and never disarm.
Update, proof I asked Glock for comment on X,
Update,
Update,
Leave a Reply