As covered by waronguns.com recently, here, https://waronguns.com/glockteasers/ Glock didn’t send a representative or lawyer to a committee hearing in the California legislature as they debated a bill which would ban Glocks from being sold in the state. Only Sam Paredes of GOA testified AGAINST banning Glocks. That’s right, only GOA, not Glock themselves, not SAF, not NRA, not FPC, not NAGR. Only GOA.
Now, I see on GOA’s website, Glock will be at GOALS. Because apparently Glock cares so much about the Second Amendment…
Does Glock care about the Second Amendment or do they care more about their government contracts? If they cared more about government contracts, it would make sense NOT to testify in the California legislature against banning their guns, as the ban would only apply to civilians, that’s the Militia, as mentioned in the Second Amendment. Not government entities, like thousands, of police agencies at all levels.
Leave a Reply