Back in 2019, this appeared, https://www.ammoland.com/2019/07/open-letter-from-a-concerned-fellow-nra-ring-of-freedom-member/
Why did they want Chris Cox as NRA CEO/EVP? Did they not know of this… https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A8ijtVkTCCQ&t=48s Chris Cox and NRA were advocating for red flag laws!
And in 2007, Cox/NRA were against machine guns. https://waronguns.blogspot.com/search?q=Chris+Cox
And 2017, Cox/NRA wanted to ban bump stocks. https://waronguns.blogspot.com/2017/10/yeah-ive-always-welcomed-quislings.html
Then the wife of one of the plaintiffs of the NRA RICO lawsuit was a member of NRA’s WLF… Remember this, https://nraindanger.wordpress.com/2024/09/10/major-new-lawsuit-filed/
I used to think RICO was a good idea. But the more I learn of about the plaintiffs the more I question it. And again, if the plantiffs win, and NRA is found to be guilty of RICO, why do four people expect to get at a minimum $60million, and trippled because of RICO so, minimum $180million?
The most vocal plaintiff, or rather the only one which seems to make public comments, David Dell’Aquila, says he donated a little over $100,000. How does that turn into $180million plus in damages?
If NRA is found guilty of RICO, shouldn’t all members be compensated? Not just four?
And as Dell’Aquila has stated on a blog, settlement talks have broken down, and they will be proceeding to trial. Is this really about justice? Or $180million plus?
I’m just asking questions.
Leave a Reply