People, typically dislike me, in this internet sphere of Second Amendment writing. Whether it’s people on various forums comments sections, people at the NRA, and now most recently, I triggered the reload… https://2awhiterook.com/i-triggered-the-reload/ I triggered the reload so much he called me “a racist dipshit”, later he says in the comments of the blog post, that I “dislike… minorities”. When I challenged him to show me where I’d done such a thing, the elite Second Amendment writer and pod-caster suddenly was M.I.A.
Likewise, earlier I’d triggered NRA director Jeff Knox, due to my calling bullshit on the the NRA’s support of DEI and Knox’s word salad gibberish excuses on the matter, which is what subsequently triggered the reload. https://2awhiterook.com/why-is-nra-director-jeff-knox-pushing-dei/
But why? First my triggering the reload, probably begins with a philosophical difference,
A well regulated Militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
I view that to mean, we the people get to keep and bear arms… Period. And “arms”, being all the terrible and deadly implements of the soldier. I’m a Second Amendment absolutist. Anyone who’s not currently, after due process, in a prison, or a mental institution, or in the care of a custodian, can keep and bear whatever kind of arms they so choose. See how simple that is? How black and white it is?
Now the triggered reload, doesn’t have a black and white point of view on this, like I do. He’s been involved with 97%, have you heard of them? They’re a collection of fudds and butters and antis, https://www.97percent.us/. This is a good synopsis of what a 97% event is, https://www.firearmsnews.com/editorial/gun-safety-symposium/393970
Now, if we listen to the triggered reload in his own words, he’s no Second Amendment absolutist, like I am. Where I see black and white, he sees grey, and opportunities to consort with the enemy, listen, https://thereload.com/gutowski-tells-npr-the-two-factors-that-will-determine-the-future-of-the-gun-debate/
Some highlights, if the 5min interview was too painful,
At about 1:30 he says Saint Floyd was “killed”… Not so, it’s called a fatal drug overdose.
At 2:15 he claims there’s “a high level of approval” in polling for “universal background checks” and “assault weapons bans”… Really? What “polls” outside of NYT and CNN say such things? What members of the American Militia support such infringements on the Second Amendment of the United States Constitution?
At 2:50 he claims there’s “common grounds between gun owners and people who want to reduce gun crime and gun violence”… First, what is “gun crime and gun violence”? There are no such things. And these “common grounds” between, believers in the 2nd Amendment, and those who support citizen disarmament and a government monopoly on violence… How can there be “common grounds” between people who exercise their 2nd Amendment rights, many of whom will refuse to disarm, and those who wish to see them disarmed? Discounting fudds and butters like the triggered reload, show me one who has “common grounds” with the antis.
At 3:15 he talks about “violence interruption programs” and goes on to state he thinks they “are far less controversial than things like new gun bans”. I presume he’s not talking about treating a devilish character who’s in the middle of committing his evil act, with a heavy dose of overwhelming firepower. Nor keeping animals caged as opposed to turning them loose to feast upon an unsuspecting prey. I further presume he’s not talking about a future tyrannical government going on the prod, and the Militia standing up and acting in common defense to preserve their communities and the Constitution. No, I presume the triggered reload is referring to red flag laws instead. If he is, then he’s giving ground to the enemy.
At 3:35 and 4:15 he refers to “gun crimes” again. “Gun crimes”, and as he said before, “gun violence”, no such things exist, and to accept such impossibilities as fact makes him delusional.
And the triggered reload, apparently spoke at a 97% event, https://waronguns.com/can-we-all-get-along-6/
It’s easy now to see how his reading of my calling bullshit on NRA’s DEI initiatives and my back and forth with NRA director Jeff Knox where I called out his bullshit word salad defense of those very NRA DEI initiatives could so trigger the reload, and for the elite Second Amendment writer who believes it smart to consort with the enemy, would see me as a “racist dipshit”, and why I have “open dislike” for “minorities”… You see the elites don’t like to debate when the peasants refuse to swallow their lies, as they know their positions are indefensible. In their ivory towers, they can’t fathom how we could possibly refuse to accept their views. Thus the name calling.
I don’t care about being liked, or followed. I’m no “team player”. I want the truth. If that triggers people, oh well. Although the triggered reload’s reaction truthfully gave me the best laugh of the week.
Equip, train, pray and never disarm.
Leave a Reply